Why bother cooking? The reasons to skip it are stacked as
high as the microwavable meals in a Costco freezer case. You don’t have time,
of course (or you think you don’t); that’s the big one. But you also don’t do
it as well as the professionals, so it’s tempting to let them handle it for
you. Or at least let them give you a head start in the form of meal-assembly
shops, cake mixes, and canned, frozen and pre-chopped ingredients.
Michael Pollan thinks you should bother, and not just as
a fashionable exercise in hipsterdom. His latest book,“Cooked,” is a
powerful argument for a return to home cooking of the sort that doesn’t begin
with an attempt to find the perforated opening.
Pollan is not the first person to issue this clarion
call. Scores of food writers and editors, myself included, have long bemoaned
the increasing influence of corporations on the public’s diet. We have seen the
slow retreat from the kitchen — even while interest in TV food shows has grown
— as a primary contributor to America’s (and increasingly, the world’s) obesity
epidemic and other health and environmental ills. But perhaps only Pollan can
so effectively pick up the threads of so many food movements, philosophies and
research papers and knit them into a compelling narrative with a crystal-clear
message. “My wager in ‘Cooked,’?” he writes, “is that the best way to recover
the reality of food, to return it to its proper place in our lives, is by
attempting to master the physical processes by which it has traditionally been
made.”
Don’t bet against him. Because of the power of his prose
and his reasoning, “Cooked” may prove to be just as influential as Pollan’s
seminal book, “The Omnivore’s Dilemma,” possibly the single
most-cited text by those who profess concern with how our eating choices affect
the planet.
Continue reading here.



